Cyberመላ
ETHIO-CERT DATA • NATIONAL CYBERSECURITY SNAPSHOT

Cybersecurity numbers, made understandable.

Start with the headline indicators, then explore exactly what each measure captures, how it is calculated and what it cannot tell you about an individual organization.

2024 NATIONAL BENCHMARK

A 76.34 score means substantial national cybersecurity foundations are being built.

Ethio-CERT publishes a total of 76.34 out of 100 in the ITU Global Cybersecurity Index 2024. ITU places this result in Tier 3: Establishing—a tier for countries demonstrating a basic national cybersecurity commitment while still developing and integrating measures.

In simpler terms: Ethiopia has many important building blocks in place, especially legal measures, but the five areas are not equally developed.

ITU MATURITY TIERT3Establishing

A national-level category—not an organizational grade.

THE FIVE PILLARS

Where national commitment is strongest—and where the relative gap is largest.

Each pillar can contribute up to 20 points. The bar length shows the share of that pillar's maximum, making unlike-looking decimals easy to compare.

Five horizontal bars compare Ethiopia's scores across the Global Cybersecurity Index pillars. Legal measures are highest at 18.83 out of 20 and organizational measures are lowest at 12.12 out of 20.

Ethiopia Global Cybersecurity Index 2024 pillar scores
PillarScore out of 20Percent of maximum
Legal measures18.8394.15%
Cooperation measures15.6978.45%
Capacity development15.3376.65%
Technical measures14.3771.85%
Organizational measures12.1260.6%
How to read the chart

Legal measures score highest at 18.83/20. Organizational measures score lowest at 12.12/20. This identifies a relative national-level difference within the index; it does not prove that every Ethiopian organization is strong in law or weak in governance.

REPORTED OPERATIONAL ACTIVITY

A large number of blocked attempts shows pressure on digital systems—not 50,000 successful breaches.

A July 2026 Ethio-CERT article says Information Network Security Administration (INSA) defenders intercepted more than 50,000 attempted attacks against digital systems nationwide in the referenced 2025/26 period. “Attempted attacks” can include repeated or automated activity, and “intercepted” indicates defensive action. The figure should not be read as 50,000 organizations compromised, 50,000 unique attackers, or 50,000 confirmed data breaches.

Read the Ethio-CERT article
WHAT THE GCI CAN TELL YOU

National commitment and relative development

It helps compare the presence and maturity of national legal, technical, organizational, capacity and cooperation measures.

WHAT IT CANNOT TELL YOU

Your company's security or compliance status

A national score cannot replace governance and evidence review performed under an agreed written scope.

WHAT ORGANIZATIONS SHOULD DO

Use the context, then assess your own readiness

Translate relevant obligations into owners, evidence and prioritized security actions that match your systems and operating risk.

SOURCE NOTES

Every number should answer “according to whom, for what period, and measuring what?”

  1. GCI score and five pillar measures

    Published on the Ethio-CERT homepage for the 2024 ITU Global Cybersecurity Index.

    Ethio-CERT
  2. Index meaning and tier context

    ITU methodology and 2024 report explain the national commitment benchmark and five pillars.

    ITU GCI 2024
  3. 50,000+ attempted attacks

    Reported by Ethio-CERT in a 9 July 2026 article citing INSA's defensive activity.

    Ethio-CERT article
NEED TO KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOUR ORGANIZATION?

Move from national statistics to an organization-specific readiness plan.

CyberMela offers cybersecurity consulting, readiness roadmaps, governance and evidence review under a written scope, and staff briefings.

Talk to a consultant Explore consulting services